a. distinguish between the full valuation approach (the scenario analysis approach)
and the duration/convexity approach for measuring interest rate risk, and explain
the advantage of using the full valuation approach;
The  primary  focus  of  interest  rate  risk  is  measuring  the  impact  after  an  adverse  rate change. Two approaches are used to measuring interest rate  risk:  the  full  valuation approach and the duration/convexity approach. 
 
The  full valuation approach also known as  scenario analysis. It examines the value of bonds under a variety of interest rate scenario changes.  For example, a portfolio manager might examine the change in a bond with assumed interest rate increases of 50, 100,150 and 200 basis point increases and decreases.  This approach is useful when there is a good valuation model and can be used for parallel and nonparallel shifts in the yield curve. 
 
Highly  leveraged investors (such as hedge fund investors) often use extreme scenario tests, known as stress testing, to examine the impact of wide interest rate changes. This is fine so long as the manager has a good valuation model to estimate what the price of the bonds will be in each interest rate scenario. 
 
The advantage of the duration/convexity measure is that it is a simpler measure that will show how a portfolio or single bond will change if there is  change in a parallel fashion. 
Material to be added
Monday, March 10, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment